Blog #1

Commenting on Marc Yeo’s post (link): Very interesting story about your upbringing Marc, and I agree it unfortunate that the vast majority of students have to subscribe to the school system that is rigid and could probably be more productive. The problem still remains how could this be changed though and how practical would executing it be. The fact of the matter is that those who grow up in more nurturing environments are more likely to be successful in whatever they choose to pursue and I hope our goal is to bring this perspective to our own kids one way (if one chooses to have kids).

Blog #2

Commenting on Taralyn’s post (link):

Love how you tied cooperative learning to your group’s work Taralyn. Using the jigsaw method to become experts totally mirrors real classroom collaboration. You nailed why it’s so powerful for differentiated learning: letting students lean on each other’s strengths while building empathy and inclusion. The mix of theory (like positive interdependence) with practical examples (visual/auditory tasks) makes it feel actionable, not just abstract and seems like it can be incorporated into a classes curriculum.

Blog #3

Commenting on Tianya’s post (link):

I like your focus on intentional design for inclusivity Tianya, and how it shines through the mix of adaptable formats and learner autonomy. Letting people choose written, visual, or discussion-based engagement respects their comfort zones, especially with a topic as personal as mental health. The asynchronous structure paired with accessibility tools removes barriers for those juggling schedules or needing tech support. You create safe spaces for both introverted and collaborative learners to contribute meaningfully. Prioritizing choice in expression (writing vs. dialogue) avoids a one-size-fits-all trap, which I think is a good choice when discussing sensitive issues.

Blog #4

Commenting on Conrad’s post (link):

Hey Conrad, I like how your design thoughtfully layers reflection, research, and collaboration to combat food misinformation. I like how Siegel’s video primes students to question historical myths, then pivots to modern diet trends, bringing together both the past and present in a way that grounds critical thinking in real-world relevance. The post-video activity is smartly structured: asking learners to trace a trend’s origins and confirm its credibility sharpens the inner skeptic. Pairing peer feedback with instructor evaluation creates accountability and community, ensuring students test their analyses against multiple perspectives further strengthening the evidence at hand. By closing with self-assessment questions, you reinforce metacognition, helping learners internalize how their media literacy has evolved a subtle but powerful way to cement long-term skills and very well thought out I would personally say.